Schmerber v. California

Schmerber v. California var en sak som ble behandlet i USAs høyesterett i 1966; Avgjørelsen der ble en landmark court decision;^[1] Det finnes flere slike.

Høyesterett klargjorde det fjerde grunnlovstilleggets beskyttelse mot ransaking uten rettslig ordre, og -det femte grunnlovstilleggets beskyttelse mot ransakinger inni menneskers kropp. Før Schmerber[-avgjørelsen] hadde høyesterett ikke klargjort om delstats-politifolk måtte skaffe en ransakinsordre [fra rettsvesenet] før man tok blodprøver fra personer mistenkt for kriminalitet.

Referanser rediger

^ Aron Hogden, Reconciling A Split of Authority: A South Dakota Response to Recent Developments in Drunk Driving Law, 59 S.D. L. Rev. 372, 373 (2014) (describing Schmerber v. California as a "landmark case"); see also Kelsey P. Black, Undue Protection Versus Undue Punishment: Examining the Drinking & Driving Problem Across the United States Arkivert 6. oktober 2016 hos Wayback Machine., 40 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 463, 469 (2007) (describing Schmerber v. California as a "watershed case" in the nation's Fourth Amendment jurisprudence).

[1] Aron Hogden, Reconciling A Split of Authority: A South Dakota Response to Recent Developments in Drunk Driving Law, 59 S.D. L. Rev. 372, 373 (2014) (describing Schmerber v. California as a "landmark case"); see also Kelsey P. Black, Undue Protection Versus Undue Punishment: Examining the Drinking & Driving Problem Across the United States Arkivert 6. oktober 2016 hos Wayback Machine., 40 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 463, 469 (2007) (describing Schmerber v. California as a "watershed case" in the nation's Fourth Amendment jurisprudence).

[1]